CVE-2026-40090

Description

### Impact This vulnerability impacts users of `zarf package inspect sbom` or `zarf package inspect documentation` on untrusted packages. ### Patches #4793, now fixed in version v0.74.2 ### Workarounds Avoid inspecting unsigned packages ## Description The `package inspect sbom` and `package inspect documentation` subcommands construct output file paths by joining a user-controlled output directory with the package's `Metadata.Name` field, which is attacker-controlled data read from the package archive. The `Metadata.Name` field is validated against a regex on create, `^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9\-]*$`, however a malicious user could unarchive a package to change the `.Metadata.Name` field and the files inside the SBOMS.tar. This would lead to arbitrary file write in a location of the attackers choosing. Neither location sanitizes or validates the package name before using it in the file path. **SBOM inspection:** ```go outputPath := filepath.Join(o.outputDir, pkgLayout.Pkg.Metadata.Name) err = pkgLayout.GetSBOM(ctx, outputPath) ``` **Documentation inspection (line 1219):** ```go outputPath := filepath.Join(o.outputDir, fmt.Sprintf("%s-documentation", pkgLayout.Pkg.Metadata.Name)) return pkgLayout.GetDocumentation(ctx, outputPath, o.keys) ``` `pkgLayout.Pkg.Metadata.Name` is read directly from the untrusted package's `zarf.yaml` manifest. An attacker can craft a malicious Zarf package where `Metadata.Name` contains path traversal sequences or root paths such as `../../etc/cron.d/malicious` or `/home/user/.ssh/authorized_keys`. ### CVSS Explainations #### Attack Vector Verdict: Network A malicious package could be published to OCI and inspected directly with `zarf package inspect sbom oci://<bad-package>` #### Attack Complexity Verdict: Low It is not complicated to make and publish a malicious package. The Attacker only needs to edit the zarf.yaml and sboms.tar then edit the checksums. #### Privileges Required Verdict: None The attacker is relying on the runner of `zarf package inspect sbom|documentation` and needs no other privileges. #### User Interaction Verdict: Required The user must run the inspect command #### Scope Verdict: Unchanged The vulnerability operates entirely within the permissions of the user running zarf package inspect. The file write can't escape the privilege boundary of that user #### Confidentiality Verdict: None This is an arbitrary file write vulnerability. The attacker can place or overwrite files on the filesystem but the vulnerability does not provide any mechanism to read or exfiltrate data from the target system. #### Integrity Verdict: High The attacker controls both the file path (via Metadata.Name) and the file content (via the SBOM or documentation files inside the archive). This allows writing attacker-controlled content to arbitrary locations on the filesystem, limited only by the permissions of the user running the inspect command. Realistic exploitation includes writing SSH authorized_keys, cron jobs, or shell profiles. ### Availability Verdict: Low The vulnerability does not directly target service availability. However, an attacker could overwrite files that cause system disruption.